Assessor Name
*
University / Presenter
*
Did they cover a wide range of sustainability topics?
1 - Narrow focus
2 - Two or three sustainability areas addressed
3 - Wide range of sustainability topics explored
Was their commentary thoughtful?
1 - Analysis was shallow
2 - Good analysis though not particularly insightful
3 - Analysis was incisive and deep
Was their photography high quality and creative?
1 - Very few visuals
2 - Some visuals of decent quality
3 - Plentiful visuals that helped tell the story
Were they knowledgeable about past successes and future plans?
1 - Very little insight about past successes or future plans
2 - Some acknowledgement of past successes or plans, but it lacked depth
3 - Rich, incisive analysis of past successes and future plans
Did they articulate clear and defensible priorities?
1 - They didn't explain or present their rationale for their priorities
2 - Priorities were clear and somewhat supported
3 - Clear and compelling presentation of their priorities and rationale for choosing this focus
Did they show insight about challenges, process and leadership?
1 - They didn't talk about challenges or decision makers
2 - Fairly shallow analysis of challenges or decisions makers
3 - Incisive and actionable presentation of challenges and decision makers
Did they engage other students from their campus?
1 - This appeared to be a solo effort
2 - They seemed to have at least two people involved
3 - They engaged a broad group in collecting observations about sustainability
Overall rating
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Is this a re-submission of your ratings or the first time you're rating this presentation?
First time rating this presentation
Resubmission of ratings
What did you like or appreciate about this presentation?
What suggestions do you have for improvement?
